Contact us for full library access on: 0330 0020 227 or click here

Skoda Yeti (2013 - 2017)

The independent Skoda Yeti (2013-2017) video review

This is a sample, showing 30 seconds of each section.

    TIME WAITS FOR SNOWMAN (some text hidden)

    By Jonathan Crouch

    Introductionword count: 80

    Having introduced its ground-breaking Yeti compact SUV in 2009, Skoda substantially improved it in 2013, creating the version we're going to look at here, which sold until 2017. This updated Yeti was smarter and more capable than before and also came with an off road-orientated Outdoor body style that you'll have to have if you want a version fitted with the brand's 4x4 system. Here was a smoother, more sophisticated Yeti. You can see why so many people like it.

    Modelsword count: 18

    5dr Crossover - standard & Outdoor (1.2, 1.8 petrol, 1.6, 2.0 diesel [S, SE, Elegance, GreenLine, Monte Carlo])

    Historyword count: 208

    The Yeti, as you'll probably know if you're in the market for one, is one of those SUV-style family hatchbacks on growth hormones the industry refers to as 'Crossovers'. Back in 2013, they came in two sizes, with the smaller ones derived from superminis and the bigger Qashqai-class models based on Focus-sized family hatchbacks. The Yeti hails from the larger species but was priced and sized to be able to tempt buyers shopping in either category, which probably accounts for the phenomenal success of the original version we first saw in 2009. Well over a quarter of a million Yetis were pounding global roads by the time this updated first generation model was launched in 2013. This improved version though, had a much tougher sales task on its hands than its predecessor. By 2013, almost every mainstream maker offered or was developing a compact SUV and the result was a tightly-fought sector. Skoda's response was a Yeti with smarter looks, extra equipment, a more efficient optional 4x4 drivetrain and the division of the range into either standard or more SUV-orientated 'Outdoor' models. The Yeti sold until 2017, after which it was replaced by the slightly larger Karoq model in 2018 and the slightly smaller Kamiq model in 2019.

    What You Getword count: 981

    Satisfied customers have always liked this Yeti's purposefully under-stated approach to Crossover aesthetics. You'd recognise a degree of low-key SUV-ness here - but not too much, the exact extent of visual ruggedness these days governed by the species of Yeti you decide upon; in this revised first generation model line-up, there were two. Those approaching Crossover ownership in an expeditionary frame of mind will prefer a variant from the Yeti Outdoor range, this car primarily differentiated from the standard model by 'skid plate'-style aluminium trim panels at the front and rear, black plastic side rubbing strips and front and rear bumpers optimised for the sharper approach and departure angles that characterise off road use. The design as a whole didn't change very much with the 2013 model year update, Chief Designer Josef Kaban contenting himself with a subtle front end re-style that embossed the famous winged arrow badge into the leading edge of the bonnet. A little disappointingly, the previously distinctive prominent round front foglights were replaced by smaller more conventional rectangular units moved down to the usual position either side of the lower air intake. Still, the overall look did get more of a premium feel thanks to the smart 17-slat front grille you'll find flanked by more sharply detailed headlamps with integrated daytime running lights and (on some variants) bi-xenon beams. In profile, the square, boxy profile with its neat blacked-out roof pillars remained largely unchanged, save for revised side rubbing strips and smarter alloy wheels that sat below bolder wheelarches. At the rear, where optional LED tail lights could be specified, cubist triangle elements either side of the number plate forged a visual link to other more recent Skoda resigns. This one aimed to perform the slightly awkward role of trying to appeal to potential buyers of both small and medium-sized Crossover models, something especially obvious when you lift the slab-sided tailgate and inspect the space on offer in the boot. You can increase this by pushing the rear bench right forward but you won't want to be doing that too often unless the occupants you're expecting to transport there will be below the age of ten. So with the bench in its usual rearward place, there's 416-litres on offer, a capacity that sits roughly mid-way between the kind of space you'd get in a class tiddler like a Ford EcoSport or a Renault Captur and something bigger and family hatch-based like a Peugeot 3008 or a Kia Sportage. Skoda would argue that they've got the balance just right and to be fair, this car's cargo area isn't that far from the size of that you'd get in a directly comparable Nissan Qashqai or Suzuki SX4 S-CROSS - and the capacity's actually precisely identical to another direct rival, Mitsubishi's ASX. It's perhaps more important to note that this is a very usable space. You get neat boot rails on plusher models with shopping bag hooks on either side that allow you to hang those bags neatly off a cargo area floor that can be specified to be adjustable in height to better suit awkwardly tall items. If you need more space, then the 40/20/40 split-folding rear bench drops down completely flat to reveal a 1,760-litre capacity you can boost even further if you get a car whose original owner specified the optional fold-flat front passenger seat that allows easy transport of really long items like surfboards and mountain bikes. It's worth saying a little more about the rear bench because it really is very versatile when it comes to the different permutations it can deliver as part of what Skoda calls its Varioflex seating arrangement. This simple-to-use system allows the seats to be moved forwards or backwards so that rear seat passengers can find the most comfortable position while maximising the cargo space available behind. The seats can also be reclined individually, rolled up or even completely taken out of the vehicle to release a further 180-litres of space if you're in a removal van frame of mind. That's a unique Crossover-class feature but if you opt to take advantage of it, you'll find that the chairs are fiddly to release and cumbersome to move around. Once you've got comfortable in the back, you might also note the 'platform' positioning that mounts these rear seat bases 20mm higher than those in the front to give rear folk a better view out. That sort of thing makes a real difference when it comes to things like child travel sickness. Shoulder room's good too - certainly better than you'd get in rival Nissan Qashqai and Suzuki SX4 S-CROSS models - and the tall roofline means that headroom is also class-leadingly plentiful. You can't get away though, from the fact that this car is just 1.8m wide, a fact that'll leave three adults seated back here on very friendly terms indeed. Better to seat two and fold the centre chair down so they can use the armrests work surface and cupholders that its seatback provides. Up front, the driving position is raised to afford a better view out through the broad windows and tall windscreen, though not so much as to make ownership transition into this car from an ordinary family hatch a daunting prospect. Everything falls to hand easily, though for taller folk, the gearstick might be a little easier to reach if it was mounted a bit higher. The centre console is dominated on plusher models by a large infotainment screen, though the system that drives it is older-tech than that used in an Octavia hatch from this period. Still, everything feels of high quality and clever use of different surface textures give a bright spacious feel. There's decent practicality too, with the usual cupholders, a large glovebox and, on plusher models like this one, a case for your sunglasses and a storage box underneath the front passenger seat.

    To see the full road test text contact us on 0330 0020 227

    Pictures (high res disabled)

    Scoring (subset of scores)

    Category: Crossover or SUV 4x4s

    Performance
    40%
    Handling
    70%
    Comfort
    60%
    Space
    80%
    Styling, Build, Value, Equipment, Depreciation, Handling, Insurance and Total scores are available with our full data feed.

    Subscriber? Login here

    Mobile
    Narrow
    Narrower
    Normal
    Wide